Luk vs Cipolle Borettane
Overall, Luk has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Luk | Cipolle Borettane |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | c |
| NOVA group | 1 | 3 |
| Calories | 39 kcal | 38 kcal |
| Fat | 0.6 g | 0.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.2 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 4.8 g | 4.4 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.7 g |
| Fiber | 1.7 g | 1.6 g |
| Protein | 1.1 g | 0.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | Sulphur dioxide and sulphites |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Cipolle Borettane has 84% less fat (0.1 g vs 0.6 g).
- Luk has 86% less salt (0.1 g vs 0.7 g).
- Luk has 55% more protein (1.1 g vs 0.5 g).
- Luk has the better Nutri-Score.
- Luk is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Cipolle Borettane lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.
Ingredients
Luk
luk
Cipolle Borettane
Cipolle Borettane intere, aceto di vino, acqua, zucchero, Aceto Balsamico di Modena IGP (aceto di vino, mosto d'uve concentrato, colorante: caramello solfito - ammoniacale), sale, antiossidante: acido ascorbico, correttore di acidità: acido citrico. *Contiene ANIDRIDE SOLFOROSA.. Può contenere tracce di SEDANO e SENAPE. Da consumarsi preferibilmente entro il: ved coperchio.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Luk or Cipolle Borettane?
Overall, Luk has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Cipolle Borettane has fewer calories: 38 kcal versus 39 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Cipolle Borettane has less sugar: 4.4 g versus 4.8 g per 100 g.