Low Sodium 100% Vegetable Juice vs Rote Bete Saft
Overall, Rote Bete Saft has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 ml
| Nutrient | Low Sodium 100% Vegetable Ju... | Rote Bete Saft |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | b |
| NOVA group | 4 | 1 |
| Calories | 18 kcal | 35 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 3.1 g | 7.5 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 0.6 g | 2.5 g |
| Protein | 0.6 g | 1 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | Celery | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Low Sodium 100% Vegetable Juice has 47% fewer calories (18 kcal vs 35 kcal).
- Low Sodium 100% Vegetable Juice has 59% less sugar (3.1 g vs 7.5 g).
- Rote Bete Saft has 76% more fiber (2.5 g vs 0.6 g).
- Rote Bete Saft has 39% more protein (1 g vs 0.6 g).
- Rote Bete Saft has the better Nutri-Score.
- Rote Bete Saft is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Low Sodium 100% Vegetable Juice lists: Celery.
Ingredients
Low Sodium 100% Vegetable Juice
VEGETABLE JUICE (WATER AND CONCENTRATED JUICES OF TOMATOES, CARROTS, CELERY, BEETS, PARSLEY, LETTUCE, WATERCRESS, SPINÁCH), POTASSIUM CHLORIDE, SALT, VITAMIN C (ASCORBIC ACID), NATURAL FLAVORING, BETA CAROTENE, CITRIC ACID.
Rote Bete Saft
Rote-Bete-Saft 99 %, Zitronensaft*, Acerola Kirschpulver',
FAQ
Which is healthier: Low Sodium 100% Vegetable Juice or Rote Bete Saft?
Overall, Rote Bete Saft has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Low Sodium 100% Vegetable Juice has fewer calories: 18 kcal versus 35 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Low Sodium 100% Vegetable Juice has less sugar: 3.1 g versus 7.5 g per 100 g.