Low Sodium 100% Vegetable Juice vs Pur jus de carotte BIO
Overall, Pur jus de carotte BIO has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 ml
| Nutrient | Low Sodium 100% Vegetable Ju... | Pur jus de carotte BIO |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | b |
| NOVA group | 4 | 1 |
| Calories | 18 kcal | 30 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 3.1 g | 4.7 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 0.6 g | 2.1 g |
| Protein | 0.6 g | 0.5 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | Celery | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Low Sodium 100% Vegetable Juice has 39% fewer calories (18 kcal vs 30 kcal).
- Low Sodium 100% Vegetable Juice has no fat, while Pur jus de carotte BIO has 0.5 g.
- Low Sodium 100% Vegetable Juice has 35% less sugar (3.1 g vs 4.7 g).
- Pur jus de carotte BIO has 71% more fiber (2.1 g vs 0.6 g).
- Pur jus de carotte BIO has the better Nutri-Score.
- Pur jus de carotte BIO is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Low Sodium 100% Vegetable Juice lists: Celery.
Ingredients
Low Sodium 100% Vegetable Juice
VEGETABLE JUICE (WATER AND CONCENTRATED JUICES OF TOMATOES, CARROTS, CELERY, BEETS, PARSLEY, LETTUCE, WATERCRESS, SPINÁCH), POTASSIUM CHLORIDE, SALT, VITAMIN C (ASCORBIC ACID), NATURAL FLAVORING, BETA CAROTENE, CITRIC ACID.
Pur jus de carotte BIO
Jus de carotte, jus de citron
FAQ
Which is healthier: Low Sodium 100% Vegetable Juice or Pur jus de carotte BIO?
Overall, Pur jus de carotte BIO has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Low Sodium 100% Vegetable Juice has fewer calories: 18 kcal versus 30 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Low Sodium 100% Vegetable Juice has less sugar: 3.1 g versus 4.7 g per 100 g.