Jus de légumes salé , bocal de 75cl vs Pur jus de carotte BIO
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.
Nutrition per 100 ml
| Nutrient | Jus de légumes salé , bocal... | Pur jus de carotte BIO |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | b |
| NOVA group | 3 | 1 |
| Calories | 20 kcal | 30 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 3.5 g | 4.7 g |
| Salt | 0.6 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 0.7 g | 2.1 g |
| Protein | 0.7 g | 0.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Celery | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Jus de légumes salé , bocal de 75cl has 33% fewer calories (20 kcal vs 30 kcal).
- Jus de légumes salé , bocal de 75cl has no fat, while Pur jus de carotte BIO has 0.5 g.
- Jus de légumes salé , bocal de 75cl has 26% less sugar (3.5 g vs 4.7 g).
- Pur jus de carotte BIO has 83% less salt (0.1 g vs 0.6 g).
- Pur jus de carotte BIO has 67% more fiber (2.1 g vs 0.7 g).
- Pur jus de carotte BIO is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Jus de légumes salé , bocal de 75cl lists: Celery.
Ingredients
Jus de légumes salé , bocal de 75cl
jus de tomate* 56%, jus de légumes 42.1% (carotte*, celeri*, betterave rouge*, concombre*, oignons*), sel, épices et aromates (paprika*, basilic*, persil*), acidifiant : jus de citron à base de concentré*. *ingrédient issu de l'agriculture biologique.
Pur jus de carotte BIO
Jus de carotte, jus de citron
FAQ
Which is healthier: Jus de légumes salé , bocal de 75cl or Pur jus de carotte BIO?
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Jus de légumes salé , bocal de 75cl has fewer calories: 20 kcal versus 30 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Jus de légumes salé , bocal de 75cl has less sugar: 3.5 g versus 4.7 g per 100 g.