Comparison

Lotte à l'Américaine vs Queue de lotte de chine sans peau

Overall, Queue de lotte de chine sans peau has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientLotte à l'AméricaineQueue de lotte de chine sans...
Nutri-Score a a
NOVA group — —
Calories 111 kcal 68 kcal
Fat 3.6 g 0.5 g
Saturated fat 1.5 g 0.1 g
Sugars 1.2 g 0.5 g
Salt 0.7 g 0.3 g
Fiber 0.4 g —
Protein 18 g 14.6 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Queue de lotte de chine sans peau has 39% fewer calories (68 kcal vs 111 kcal).
  • Queue de lotte de chine sans peau has 86% less fat (0.5 g vs 3.6 g).
  • Queue de lotte de chine sans peau has 93% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 1.5 g).
  • Queue de lotte de chine sans peau has 58% less sugar (0.5 g vs 1.2 g).
  • Queue de lotte de chine sans peau has 55% less salt (0.3 g vs 0.7 g).
  • Lotte à l'Américaine has 19% more protein (18 g vs 14.6 g).

Ingredients

Lotte à l'Américaine

Not available.

Queue de lotte de chine sans peau

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Lotte à l'Américaine or Queue de lotte de chine sans peau?

Overall, Queue de lotte de chine sans peau has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Queue de lotte de chine sans peau has fewer calories: 68 kcal versus 111 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Queue de lotte de chine sans peau has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 1.2 g per 100 g.

More comparisons