Lotte à l'Américaine vs Queue de lotte de chine sans peau
Overall, Queue de lotte de chine sans peau has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Lotte à l'Américaine | Queue de lotte de chine sans... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 111 kcal | 68 kcal |
| Fat | 3.6 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.5 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 1.2 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 0.7 g | 0.3 g |
| Fiber | 0.4 g | — |
| Protein | 18 g | 14.6 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Queue de lotte de chine sans peau has 39% fewer calories (68 kcal vs 111 kcal).
- Queue de lotte de chine sans peau has 86% less fat (0.5 g vs 3.6 g).
- Queue de lotte de chine sans peau has 93% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 1.5 g).
- Queue de lotte de chine sans peau has 58% less sugar (0.5 g vs 1.2 g).
- Queue de lotte de chine sans peau has 55% less salt (0.3 g vs 0.7 g).
- Lotte à l'Américaine has 19% more protein (18 g vs 14.6 g).
Ingredients
Lotte à l'Américaine
Not available.
Queue de lotte de chine sans peau
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Lotte à l'Américaine or Queue de lotte de chine sans peau?
Overall, Queue de lotte de chine sans peau has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Queue de lotte de chine sans peau has fewer calories: 68 kcal versus 111 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Queue de lotte de chine sans peau has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 1.2 g per 100 g.