Limes vs Melamangio mele essiccate
Overall, Limes has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Limes | Melamangio mele essiccate |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | d |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 20 kcal | 355 kcal |
| Fat | 0.3 g | 0.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 3.2 g | 78.6 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 13 g |
| Protein | 1 g | 1.7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Limes has 95% fewer calories (20 kcal vs 355 kcal).
- Limes has 96% less sugar (3.2 g vs 78.6 g).
- Melamangio mele essiccate has 100% more fiber (13 g vs 0 g).
- Melamangio mele essiccate has 42% more protein (1.7 g vs 1 g).
- Limes has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Limes
limes
Melamangio mele essiccate
Mele Golden Italiane essiccate.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Limes or Melamangio mele essiccate?
Overall, Limes has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Limes has fewer calories: 20 kcal versus 355 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Limes has less sugar: 3.2 g versus 78.6 g per 100 g.