Lime & coriander microwave rice vs Microwave Coconut Rice
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Lime & coriander microwave r... | Microwave Coconut Rice |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 153 kcal | 173 kcal |
| Fat | 2.4 g | 3.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.9 g | 2.6 g |
| Sugars | 0.6 g | 0.2 g |
| Salt | 0.4 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 2 g | 1.8 g |
| Protein | 3.5 g | 3.4 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Lime & coriander microwave rice has 12% fewer calories (153 kcal vs 173 kcal).
- Lime & coriander microwave rice has 36% less fat (2.4 g vs 3.8 g).
- Lime & coriander microwave rice has 66% less saturated fat (0.9 g vs 2.6 g).
- Microwave Coconut Rice has 60% less sugar (0.2 g vs 0.6 g).
- Microwave Coconut Rice has no salt, while Lime & coriander microwave rice has 0.4 g.
- Microwave Coconut Rice is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Lime & coriander microwave rice
cooked basmati rice 91% (water, basmati rice), coconut cream 4%, vegetable oil (sunflower and/or rapeseed), coriander, lime leaves, lime zest, sugar, salt, stabiliser: guar gum, flavouring,
Microwave Coconut Rice
Cooked Basmati Rice (88%) [Water, Basmati Rice], Coconut Cream (7%) [Coconut Extract, Water], Desiccated Coconut (2%), Sunflower Oil and/or Rapeseed Oil, Salt.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Lime & coriander microwave rice or Microwave Coconut Rice?
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Lime & coriander microwave rice has fewer calories: 153 kcal versus 173 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Microwave Coconut Rice has less sugar: 0.2 g versus 0.6 g per 100 g.