Comparison

Lieu MSC* façon FISH&CHIPS vs Filet de cabillaud panure bio

Overall, Filet de cabillaud panure bio has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientLieu MSC* façon FISH&CHIPSFilet de cabillaud panure bi...
Nutri-Score b a
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 205 kcal 199 kcal
Fat 12 g 8.8 g
Saturated fat 1 g 1 g
Sugars 1.1 g 1.2 g
Salt 1 g 0.7 g
Fiber 0.9 g 0.9 g
Protein 13 g 14 g
Additives60
AllergensFish, Gluten, MilkFish, Gluten

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Filet de cabillaud panure bio has 27% less fat (8.8 g vs 12 g).
  • Filet de cabillaud panure bio has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Lieu MSC* façon FISH&CHIPS lists: Milk.

Ingredients

Lieu MSC* façon FISH&CHIPS

_Lieu_ MSC (*) 62%, eau, farine de _blé_, huiles végétales (colza et tournesol en proportion variable), farine de maïs, amidon de _blé_, amidon modifié de maïs, _gluten_ de _blé_, sel, poudres à lever : diphosphate disodique et carbonate acide de sodium, poudre de _lait_ écrémé. Peut contenir des traces de mollusques, œuf, soja et céleri.

Filet de cabillaud panure bio

Cabillaud MSC (POISSON) 72%, chapelure* (farine de BLE*, levure*, sel), huile de tournesol*, eau, farine de BLE*, poudre de citron* (dextrose*, huile de citron*), sel.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Lieu MSC* façon FISH&CHIPS or Filet de cabillaud panure bio?

Overall, Filet de cabillaud panure bio has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Filet de cabillaud panure bio has fewer calories: 199 kcal versus 205 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Lieu MSC* façon FISH&CHIPS has less sugar: 1.1 g versus 1.2 g per 100 g.

More comparisons