Comparison
Le Voyageur 2010 vs Château Garineau 2012
Overall, Le Voyageur 2010 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Better choice
Le Voyageur 2010
Benoit Valérie Calvet · 750 ml
Château Garineau 2012
Château Garineau · 75 cl
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Le Voyageur 2010 | Château Garineau 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 0 kcal | 6 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | — | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 1.4 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Sulphur dioxide and sulphites | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Le Voyageur 2010 has no calories, while Château Garineau 2012 has 6 kcal.
- Le Voyageur 2010 has no sugar, while Château Garineau 2012 has 1.4 g.
- Only Le Voyageur 2010 lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.
Ingredients
Le Voyageur 2010
Vin (_sulfites_)
Château Garineau 2012
Vin rosé
FAQ
Which is healthier: Le Voyageur 2010 or Château Garineau 2012?
Overall, Le Voyageur 2010 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Le Voyageur 2010 has fewer calories: 0 kcal versus 6 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Le Voyageur 2010 has less sugar: 0 g versus 1.4 g per 100 g.
More comparisons
Ardèche Syrah IGP rosé g... vs Le Voyageur 2010
Le Voyageur 2010 vs Vin rosé Les Oliviers Cô...
Rosé pamplemousse vs Le Voyageur 2010
Rosé pamplemousse vs Château Garineau 2012
Château Garineau 2012 vs Mateus Rosé Original
Le Voyageur 2010 vs Mateus Rosé Original
Gris vs Château Garineau 2012
Gris vs Le Voyageur 2010