Gris vs Le Voyageur 2010
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Gris | Le Voyageur 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | — | 3 |
| Calories | 3 kcal | 0 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | — |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Sulphur dioxide and sulphites |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Only Le Voyageur 2010 lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.
Ingredients
Gris
GRIS 2016 PAYS D'oc - INDICATION GÉOGRAPHIQUE PROTÉGÉE Cevin Gris présente une robe lumineuse, un nez de fruits EAN2029458 ais et une bouche délicate. A servir avec un plateau de Ou vos desserts au chocolat. Produit de France. eille par : Trilles, Avenue de l'Europe, tient des sulfites 12,5% vol.
Le Voyageur 2010
Vin (_sulfites_)
FAQ
Which is healthier: Gris or Le Voyageur 2010?
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Le Voyageur 2010 has fewer calories: 0 kcal versus 3 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Gris has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.