Gris vs Château Garineau 2012
Overall, Gris has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Gris | Château Garineau 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | — | 3 |
| Calories | 3 kcal | 6 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 1.4 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Gris has no sugar, while Château Garineau 2012 has 1.4 g.
Ingredients
Gris
GRIS 2016 PAYS D'oc - INDICATION GÉOGRAPHIQUE PROTÉGÉE Cevin Gris présente une robe lumineuse, un nez de fruits EAN2029458 ais et une bouche délicate. A servir avec un plateau de Ou vos desserts au chocolat. Produit de France. eille par : Trilles, Avenue de l'Europe, tient des sulfites 12,5% vol.
Château Garineau 2012
Vin rosé
FAQ
Which is healthier: Gris or Château Garineau 2012?
Overall, Gris has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Gris has fewer calories: 3 kcal versus 6 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Gris has less sugar: 0 g versus 1.4 g per 100 g.