Comparison

Le Voyageur 2010 vs Mateus Rosé Original

Overall, Le Voyageur 2010 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 ml

NutrientLe Voyageur 2010Mateus Rosé Original
Nutri-Score — —
NOVA group 3 3
Calories 0 kcal 321 kcal
Fat 0 g 0.9 g
Saturated fat — 0.3 g
Sugars 0 g 70.3 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Fiber 0 g 4.2 g
Protein 0 g 3 g
Additives00
AllergensSulphur dioxide and sulphitesNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Le Voyageur 2010 has no calories, while Mateus Rosé Original has 321 kcal.
  • Le Voyageur 2010 has no fat, while Mateus Rosé Original has 0.9 g.
  • Le Voyageur 2010 has no sugar, while Mateus Rosé Original has 70.3 g.
  • Mateus Rosé Original has 100% more fiber (4.2 g vs 0 g).
  • Mateus Rosé Original has 100% more protein (3 g vs 0 g).
  • Only Le Voyageur 2010 lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.

Ingredients

Le Voyageur 2010

Vin (_sulfites_)

Mateus Rosé Original

raisins

FAQ

Which is healthier: Le Voyageur 2010 or Mateus Rosé Original?

Overall, Le Voyageur 2010 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Le Voyageur 2010 has fewer calories: 0 kcal versus 321 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Le Voyageur 2010 has less sugar: 0 g versus 70.3 g per 100 g.

More comparisons