Rosé pamplemousse vs Le Voyageur 2010
Overall, Le Voyageur 2010 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 ml
| Nutrient | Rosé pamplemousse | Le Voyageur 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 5 kcal | 0 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | — |
| Sugars | 1.1 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 4 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Sulphur dioxide and sulphites |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Le Voyageur 2010 has no calories, while Rosé pamplemousse has 5 kcal.
- Le Voyageur 2010 has no sugar, while Rosé pamplemousse has 1.1 g.
- Le Voyageur 2010 is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Le Voyageur 2010 lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.
Ingredients
Rosé pamplemousse
vin rosé 76% , eau 19,6%, sirop de pamplemousse 3,9%, arôme naturel de pamplemousse 0,0024%, gomme arabique (E414), conservateur : sorbate de potassium (E202), acide métatartrique (E353), antioxydant : bisulfite de potassium (E228)
Le Voyageur 2010
Vin (_sulfites_)
FAQ
Which is healthier: Rosé pamplemousse or Le Voyageur 2010?
Overall, Le Voyageur 2010 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Le Voyageur 2010 has fewer calories: 0 kcal versus 5 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Le Voyageur 2010 has less sugar: 0 g versus 1.1 g per 100 g.