Comparison

Lasagnes au deux saumons vs Lasagnes aux 2 saumons

Overall, Lasagnes aux 2 saumons has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientLasagnes au deux saumonsLasagnes aux 2 saumons
Nutri-Score c c
NOVA group — 3
Calories 109 kcal 94 kcal
Fat 4.9 g 4.8 g
Saturated fat 1.3 g 2.5 g
Sugars 2.4 g 1.8 g
Salt 0.6 g 0.7 g
Fiber 0 g 0.6 g
Protein 5.1 g 4.9 g
Additives00
AllergensFish, MilkCelery, Eggs, Fish, Gluten, Milk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Lasagnes aux 2 saumons has 14% fewer calories (94 kcal vs 109 kcal).
  • Lasagnes au deux saumons has 48% less saturated fat (1.3 g vs 2.5 g).
  • Lasagnes aux 2 saumons has 25% less sugar (1.8 g vs 2.4 g).
  • Lasagnes aux 2 saumons has 100% more fiber (0.6 g vs 0 g).
  • Only Lasagnes aux 2 saumons lists: Celery, Eggs, Gluten.

Ingredients

Lasagnes au deux saumons

Not available.

Lasagnes aux 2 saumons

Eau, semoule de blé dur, 12,3% saumon ASC (poissons), crème fraîche (lait), carotte, courgette, amidon de maïs, lait entier en poudre, oignon, poireaux, Emmental (lait), vin blanc, céleri, 0,6% saumon fumé ASC (saumon (poissons), sel), sel, farine de blé, concentré de tomate, jus de citron concentré, œuf entier, huile de tournesol, ail, macis, poivre, paprika. Traces éventuelles de moutarde, de crustacés, de mollusques, de soja, de graines de sésame et de fruits à coque.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Lasagnes au deux saumons or Lasagnes aux 2 saumons?

Overall, Lasagnes aux 2 saumons has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Lasagnes aux 2 saumons has fewer calories: 94 kcal versus 109 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Lasagnes aux 2 saumons has less sugar: 1.8 g versus 2.4 g per 100 g.

More comparisons