Lachsburger paniert vs Burger de cabillaud
Overall, Burger de cabillaud has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Lachsburger paniert | Burger de cabillaud |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 235 kcal | 193 kcal |
| Fat | 10.1 g | 8.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 1.1 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.9 g |
| Salt | 1.4 g | 1.1 g |
| Protein | 12.3 g | 12 g |
| Additives | 5 | 6 |
| Allergens | Fish, Gluten | Eggs, Fish, Gluten, Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Burger de cabillaud has 18% fewer calories (193 kcal vs 235 kcal).
- Burger de cabillaud has 14% less fat (8.7 g vs 10.1 g).
- Lachsburger paniert has no saturated fat, while Burger de cabillaud has 1.1 g.
- Lachsburger paniert has no sugar, while Burger de cabillaud has 0.9 g.
- Burger de cabillaud has 23% less salt (1.1 g vs 1.4 g).
- Only Burger de cabillaud lists: Eggs, Milk.
Ingredients
Lachsburger paniert
60% burger de saumon (73,6% saumon de l'Atlantique hachée, farine de blé, échalotes, fibres de blé, stabilisant: citrates de sodium; épices (ail en poudre, poivre blanc), herbes (échalotes), sel de cuisine, dextrose, levure, antioxydant: acide citrique), 40% pâte à frire (farine de blé, farine de maïs, eau, huile de colza, amidon modifié, sel de cuisine, poudre à lever: carbonate de sodium; épices, oignons en poudre). Saumon Atlantique (Salmo salar) issues de l'aquaculture intensive en A*) Norvège, B*) Chili ou C*) Ecosse.
Burger de cabillaud
62% cabillaud (poisson (Gadus morhua, pêché aux lignes et aux chaluts dans l'Atlantique nord-est (Mer de Barents et eaux islandaises) (FAO n° 271, chapelure (farine de _blé_ eau, dextrose, levure, sel, amidon de pomme de terre, huile de colza, poudre à lever: carbonates de sodium ], huile de tournesol, farine de blé, blanc d'œuf, amidon modifié (blé), sel, amidon de pome de terre, gluten de blé, dextrose, poudres à lever: diphosphates, carbonates de sodium: acidifiant: acide citrique: sirop de glucose déshydraté, épaississants: gomme guar, gomme xanthane: caséinate de sodium (lait)
FAQ
Which is healthier: Lachsburger paniert or Burger de cabillaud?
Overall, Burger de cabillaud has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Burger de cabillaud has fewer calories: 193 kcal versus 235 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Lachsburger paniert has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.9 g per 100 g.