La gaufre liegeoise vs Gaufre chasse
Overall, Gaufre chasse has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | La gaufre liegeoise | Gaufre chasse |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 440 kcal | 433 kcal |
| Fat | 22 g | 22 g |
| Saturated fat | 12 g | 11 g |
| Sugars | 30 g | 22 g |
| Salt | 0.6 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | 1.2 g | — |
| Protein | 4.9 g | 6.8 g |
| Additives | 0 | 3 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Gaufre chasse has 27% less sugar (22 g vs 30 g).
- Gaufre chasse has 59% less salt (0.2 g vs 0.6 g).
- Gaufre chasse has 28% more protein (6.8 g vs 4.9 g).
Ingredients
La gaufre liegeoise
Not available.
Gaufre chasse
Ingrédients : Farine (blé, enzymes (blé), agent de traitement de la farine (E300)), sucre, huiles et graisses végétales (palme, colza en proportions variables), eau, œuf, levure, sirop de sucre inverti, lait en poudre, sel, émulsifiant (E322 (contient du soja), E471), arôme.
FAQ
Which is healthier: La gaufre liegeoise or Gaufre chasse?
Overall, Gaufre chasse has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Gaufre chasse has fewer calories: 433 kcal versus 440 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Gaufre chasse has less sugar: 22 g versus 30 g per 100 g.