Sugar Waffle vs Gaufre chasse
Overall, Gaufre chasse has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Sugar Waffle | Gaufre chasse |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 445 kcal | 433 kcal |
| Fat | 22.3 g | 22 g |
| Saturated fat | 9.1 g | 11 g |
| Sugars | 28.4 g | 22 g |
| Salt | 0.6 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | 2.5 g | — |
| Protein | 4.9 g | 6.8 g |
| Additives | 1 | 3 |
| Allergens | Eggs, Gluten, Soybeans | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Sugar Waffle has 17% less saturated fat (9.1 g vs 11 g).
- Gaufre chasse has 23% less sugar (22 g vs 28.4 g).
- Gaufre chasse has 62% less salt (0.2 g vs 0.6 g).
- Gaufre chasse has 28% more protein (6.8 g vs 4.9 g).
- Only Sugar Waffle lists: Eggs, Gluten, Soybeans.
Ingredients
Sugar Waffle
_Wheat_ Flour, crunchy Sugar Pieces (26%), Palm Oil, Pasteurised, Whole _Egg_, Invert Sugar Syrup, Yeast, Coconut Oil, _Soya_ Flour, Rapeseed Oil, Sugar, Salt, Emulsifier (Soya Lecithins), Flavouring.
Gaufre chasse
Ingrédients : Farine (blé, enzymes (blé), agent de traitement de la farine (E300)), sucre, huiles et graisses végétales (palme, colza en proportions variables), eau, œuf, levure, sirop de sucre inverti, lait en poudre, sel, émulsifiant (E322 (contient du soja), E471), arôme.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Sugar Waffle or Gaufre chasse?
Overall, Gaufre chasse has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Gaufre chasse has fewer calories: 433 kcal versus 445 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Gaufre chasse has less sugar: 22 g versus 28.4 g per 100 g.