Kürbiskerne vs Pipa Calabaza Natural
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Kürbiskerne | Pipa Calabaza Natural |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 567 kcal | 582 kcal |
| Fat | 44 g | 47.9 g |
| Saturated fat | 7.9 g | 8.5 g |
| Sugars | 2 g | 1.6 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 7.6 g | 5.5 g |
| Protein | 35 g | 35.3 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pipa Calabaza Natural has 20% less sugar (1.6 g vs 2 g).
- Kürbiskerne has 28% more fiber (7.6 g vs 5.5 g).
Ingredients
Kürbiskerne
Kürbiskerne. Kann Spuren von _Schalenfrüchten_ und _Erdnüssen_ enthalten.
Pipa Calabaza Natural
Pipas de calabaza peladas.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Kürbiskerne or Pipa Calabaza Natural?
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Kürbiskerne has fewer calories: 567 kcal versus 582 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pipa Calabaza Natural has less sugar: 1.6 g versus 2 g per 100 g.