Kombucha Framboise vs Kombucha
Overall, Kombucha has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Kombucha Framboise | Kombucha |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | — |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 11 kcal | 15 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 2.5 g | 1.7 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Kombucha has 32% less sugar (1.7 g vs 2.5 g).
Ingredients
Kombucha Framboise
Kombucha gazéifié (eau filtrée, sucre de canne blond (consommé en grande partie lors de la fermentation), thé vert, culture de kombucha, infusion d'hibiscus (eau, fleurs d'hibiscus), arôme nature biologique de framboise.
Kombucha
89,6% thé de kombucha (eau, sucre, 0.5% thé vert, kombucha), 7,2% jus de citron, 2,7% jus de citron vert, glycosides de stéviol issus de Stevi, arôme naturel de citron, dioxyde de carbone
FAQ
Which is healthier: Kombucha Framboise or Kombucha?
Overall, Kombucha has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Kombucha Framboise has fewer calories: 11 kcal versus 15 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kombucha has less sugar: 1.7 g versus 2.5 g per 100 g.