Kombucha mangue passion vs Kombucha
Overall, Kombucha has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Kombucha mangue passion | Kombucha |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | — |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 11 kcal | 15 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 2.5 g | 1.7 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Kombucha has 32% less sugar (1.7 g vs 2.5 g).
Ingredients
Kombucha mangue passion
94% kombucha, gazéifié, (eau filtrée, sucre de canne (consommé en grande partie lors de la fermentation), thé vert, culture de kombucha), 5% purée de mangue, 1% jus de fruit de la passion le kombucha peut contenir des traces d'alcool (<1,2% vol).
Kombucha
89,6% thé de kombucha (eau, sucre, 0.5% thé vert, kombucha), 7,2% jus de citron, 2,7% jus de citron vert, glycosides de stéviol issus de Stevi, arôme naturel de citron, dioxyde de carbone
FAQ
Which is healthier: Kombucha mangue passion or Kombucha?
Overall, Kombucha has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Kombucha mangue passion has fewer calories: 11 kcal versus 15 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kombucha has less sugar: 1.7 g versus 2.5 g per 100 g.