Comparison
Kokos geraspelt vs Kokosbrood
Overall, Kokos geraspelt has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Kokos geraspelt | Kokosbrood |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | e |
| NOVA group | 1 | 4 |
| Calories | 660 kcal | 413 kcal |
| Fat | 63 g | 14 g |
| Saturated fat | 55 g | 13 g |
| Sugars | 6.4 g | 42 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 20 g | 5.5 g |
| Protein | 6.2 g | 2.7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Kokosbrood has 37% fewer calories (413 kcal vs 660 kcal).
- Kokosbrood has 78% less fat (14 g vs 63 g).
- Kokosbrood has 76% less saturated fat (13 g vs 55 g).
- Kokos geraspelt has 85% less sugar (6.4 g vs 42 g).
- Kokos geraspelt has 73% more fiber (20 g vs 5.5 g).
- Kokos geraspelt has 56% more protein (6.2 g vs 2.7 g).
- Kokos geraspelt has the better Nutri-Score.
- Kokos geraspelt is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Kokosbrood lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Kokos geraspelt
Kokos geraspelt
Kokosbrood
Kokos 28%, glucose-fructosestroop, glutenvrij tarwezetmeel, dextrose, suiker, gelatine
FAQ
Which is healthier: Kokos geraspelt or Kokosbrood?
Overall, Kokos geraspelt has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Kokosbrood has fewer calories: 413 kcal versus 660 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kokos geraspelt has less sugar: 6.4 g versus 42 g per 100 g.