Knoblauch-Dip vs Sauce à l'ail
Overall, Sauce à l'ail has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 ml
| Nutrient | Knoblauch-Dip | Sauce à l'ail |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 740 kcal | 547 kcal |
| Fat | 68 g | 55.9 g |
| Saturated fat | 6.5 g | 5.6 g |
| Sugars | 3 g | 5.3 g |
| Salt | 1.2 g | 0.9 g |
| Fiber | 0.3 g | 0.5 g |
| Protein | 1.1 g | 1.2 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | Eggs, Mustard | Celery, Eggs, Gluten, Milk, Mustard |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Sauce à l'ail has 26% fewer calories (547 kcal vs 740 kcal).
- Sauce à l'ail has 18% less fat (55.9 g vs 68 g).
- Sauce à l'ail has 14% less saturated fat (5.6 g vs 6.5 g).
- Knoblauch-Dip has 43% less sugar (3 g vs 5.3 g).
- Sauce à l'ail has the better Nutri-Score.
- Sauce à l'ail is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Sauce à l'ail lists: Celery, Gluten, Milk.
Ingredients
Knoblauch-Dip
Rapsöl, Wasser, pasteurisiertes Eigelb, Zucker, Knoblauch 5%, Senfsaaten, Branntweinessig, Speisesalz, Dextrose, Citronensäure, Gewürze
Sauce à l'ail
huile de tournesol 55%, eau, vinaigre de table, sucre, ail séché 3.6%, oignons marinés (oignons, sucre, sel, vinaigre de table, antioxydantacided trique, acide ascorbique)), jaune d'œuf en poudre, moutarde (eau, graines de moutarde, vinaigre de table, sel, sucre, épices, artime amidon de mais sel, persil, curcuma. Peut contenir. céleri, blé, lait, soja.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Knoblauch-Dip or Sauce à l'ail?
Overall, Sauce à l'ail has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Sauce à l'ail has fewer calories: 547 kcal versus 740 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Knoblauch-Dip has less sugar: 3 g versus 5.3 g per 100 g.