Comparison

Kleine Pommes vs Antica Ricetta 1936

Overall, Kleine Pommes has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.

Better choice

Nutrition per 100 g

Nutrient	Kleine Pommes	Antica Ricetta 1936
Nutri-Score	c	c
NOVA group	—	3
Calories	289 kcal	484 kcal
Fat	14 g	24 g
Saturated fat	1.4 g	2.1 g
Sugars	0.3 g	0.6 g
Salt	0.7 g	1.1 g
Fiber	3.6 g	5.5 g
Protein	3.6 g	7.2 g
Additives	0	0
Allergens	None listed	None listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

Kleine Pommes has 40% fewer calories (289 kcal vs 484 kcal).
Kleine Pommes has 42% less fat (14 g vs 24 g).
Kleine Pommes has 33% less saturated fat (1.4 g vs 2.1 g).
Kleine Pommes has 50% less sugar (0.3 g vs 0.6 g).
Kleine Pommes has 40% less salt (0.7 g vs 1.1 g).
Antica Ricetta 1936 has 35% more fiber (5.5 g vs 3.6 g).
Antica Ricetta 1936 has 50% more protein (7.2 g vs 3.6 g).

Ingredients

Kleine Pommes

Bâtonnets de pommes de terre frites

Antica Ricetta 1936

Patate, olio di girasole alto oleico, sale marino.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Kleine Pommes or Antica Ricetta 1936?

Overall, Kleine Pommes has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Kleine Pommes has fewer calories: 289 kcal versus 484 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Kleine Pommes has less sugar: 0.3 g versus 0.6 g per 100 g.

More comparisons

Pommes Frites - Terra Ve... vs Antica Ricetta 1936 Kleine Pommes vs Pommes Frites - Terra Ve... Süßkartoffel Pommes vs Antica Ricetta 1936 Antica Ricetta 1936 vs Potato pops signature Kleine Pommes vs Potato pops signature Kleine Pommes vs Süßkartoffel Pommes Antica Ricetta 1936 vs Patatine al sale marino... Kleine Pommes vs Patatine al sale marino...