Antica Ricetta 1936 vs Potato pops signature
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Antica Ricetta 1936 | Potato pops signature |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 484 kcal | 183 kcal |
| Fat | 24 g | 8.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.1 g | 1 g |
| Sugars | 0.6 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 1.1 g | 0.9 g |
| Fiber | 5.5 g | 2 g |
| Protein | 7.2 g | 2.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Potato pops signature has 62% fewer calories (183 kcal vs 484 kcal).
- Potato pops signature has 65% less fat (8.5 g vs 24 g).
- Potato pops signature has 52% less saturated fat (1 g vs 2.1 g).
- Antica Ricetta 1936 has 64% more fiber (5.5 g vs 2 g).
- Antica Ricetta 1936 has 65% more protein (7.2 g vs 2.5 g).
- Antica Ricetta 1936 is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Antica Ricetta 1936
Patate, olio di girasole alto oleico, sale marino.
Potato pops signature
Pommes de terre (89%), huile de tournesol (8,5%), pommes de terre déshydratées, sel, dextrose, extrait de poivre noir.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Antica Ricetta 1936 or Potato pops signature?
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Potato pops signature has fewer calories: 183 kcal versus 484 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Potato pops signature has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.6 g per 100 g.