Comparison

Crinkle Cut Oven Chips vs Antica Ricetta 1936

Overall, Crinkle Cut Oven Chips has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientCrinkle Cut Oven ChipsAntica Ricetta 1936
Nutri-Score a c
NOVA group 3 3
Calories 163 kcal 484 kcal
Fat 4.3 g 24 g
Saturated fat 0.6 g 2.1 g
Sugars 0.3 g 0.6 g
Salt 0.1 g 1.1 g
Fiber 3.3 g 5.5 g
Protein 3.1 g 7.2 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Crinkle Cut Oven Chips has 66% fewer calories (163 kcal vs 484 kcal).
  • Crinkle Cut Oven Chips has 82% less fat (4.3 g vs 24 g).
  • Crinkle Cut Oven Chips has 71% less saturated fat (0.6 g vs 2.1 g).
  • Crinkle Cut Oven Chips has 50% less sugar (0.3 g vs 0.6 g).
  • Crinkle Cut Oven Chips has 90% less salt (0.1 g vs 1.1 g).
  • Antica Ricetta 1936 has 40% more fiber (5.5 g vs 3.3 g).
  • Antica Ricetta 1936 has 57% more protein (7.2 g vs 3.1 g).
  • Crinkle Cut Oven Chips has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Crinkle Cut Oven Chips

96% Potatoes, 4% Sunflower Oil.

Antica Ricetta 1936

Patate, olio di girasole alto oleico, sale marino.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Crinkle Cut Oven Chips or Antica Ricetta 1936?

Overall, Crinkle Cut Oven Chips has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Crinkle Cut Oven Chips has fewer calories: 163 kcal versus 484 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Crinkle Cut Oven Chips has less sugar: 0.3 g versus 0.6 g per 100 g.

More comparisons