Crinkle Cut Oven Chips vs Antica Ricetta 1936
Overall, Crinkle Cut Oven Chips has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Crinkle Cut Oven Chips | Antica Ricetta 1936 |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | c |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 163 kcal | 484 kcal |
| Fat | 4.3 g | 24 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.6 g | 2.1 g |
| Sugars | 0.3 g | 0.6 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 1.1 g |
| Fiber | 3.3 g | 5.5 g |
| Protein | 3.1 g | 7.2 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Crinkle Cut Oven Chips has 66% fewer calories (163 kcal vs 484 kcal).
- Crinkle Cut Oven Chips has 82% less fat (4.3 g vs 24 g).
- Crinkle Cut Oven Chips has 71% less saturated fat (0.6 g vs 2.1 g).
- Crinkle Cut Oven Chips has 50% less sugar (0.3 g vs 0.6 g).
- Crinkle Cut Oven Chips has 90% less salt (0.1 g vs 1.1 g).
- Antica Ricetta 1936 has 40% more fiber (5.5 g vs 3.3 g).
- Antica Ricetta 1936 has 57% more protein (7.2 g vs 3.1 g).
- Crinkle Cut Oven Chips has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Crinkle Cut Oven Chips
96% Potatoes, 4% Sunflower Oil.
Antica Ricetta 1936
Patate, olio di girasole alto oleico, sale marino.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Crinkle Cut Oven Chips or Antica Ricetta 1936?
Overall, Crinkle Cut Oven Chips has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Crinkle Cut Oven Chips has fewer calories: 163 kcal versus 484 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Crinkle Cut Oven Chips has less sugar: 0.3 g versus 0.6 g per 100 g.