Kirsch-Pfirsich-Maracuja vs ST. Dalfour
Overall, ST. Dalfour has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Kirsch-Pfirsich-Maracuja | ST. Dalfour |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 245 kcal | 208 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 55 g | 49 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 2 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- ST. Dalfour has 15% fewer calories (208 kcal vs 245 kcal).
- ST. Dalfour has no fat, while Kirsch-Pfirsich-Maracuja has 0.5 g.
- ST. Dalfour has 11% less sugar (49 g vs 55 g).
- Kirsch-Pfirsich-Maracuja has 100% more protein (0.5 g vs 0 g).
Ingredients
Kirsch-Pfirsich-Maracuja
Sauerkirschen (37%), Zucker, Glukose-Fruktose-Sirup, Pfirsiche (11 %), Maracujas (2 %), Geliermittel: Pektine; Sauerungsmittel: Citronensaure.
ST. Dalfour
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Kirsch-Pfirsich-Maracuja or ST. Dalfour?
Overall, ST. Dalfour has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
ST. Dalfour has fewer calories: 208 kcal versus 245 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
ST. Dalfour has less sugar: 49 g versus 55 g per 100 g.