Comparison

Kikkererwten in curry vs Weiße Bohnen in Tomatensoße

Overall, Weiße Bohnen in Tomatensoße has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientKikkererwten in curryWeiße Bohnen in Tomatensoße
Nutri-Score b b
NOVA group 3 3
Calories 118 kcal 86 kcal
Fat 6.5 g 0.6 g
Saturated fat 1 g 0.1 g
Sugars 1.1 g 4.6 g
Salt 0.7 g 0.7 g
Fiber 4.3 g 6 g
Protein 3.7 g 5.1 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Weiße Bohnen in Tomatensoße has 27% fewer calories (86 kcal vs 118 kcal).
  • Weiße Bohnen in Tomatensoße has 91% less fat (0.6 g vs 6.5 g).
  • Weiße Bohnen in Tomatensoße has 90% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 1 g).
  • Kikkererwten in curry has 76% less sugar (1.1 g vs 4.6 g).
  • Weiße Bohnen in Tomatensoße has 28% more fiber (6 g vs 4.3 g).
  • Weiße Bohnen in Tomatensoße has 27% more protein (5.1 g vs 3.7 g).

Ingredients

Kikkererwten in curry

60% currysaus (water, tomatenpuree, raapzaadolie, kokosmelk (kokosnootextract, water), ui, specerijen (kurkuma, 0,4% koriander, komijn, zwarte peper, kaneel, kardemom, kruidnagel), gember, 1,2% knoflook, zeezout, chili stukjes), 40% kikkererwten.

Weiße Bohnen in Tomatensoße

Weiße Bohnen (61%), Wasser, konzentriertes Tomatenmark davon geste (5%), Zucker, Meersalz, Branntweinessig, Maisstärke, natürliches Kräuter Aroma.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Kikkererwten in curry or Weiße Bohnen in Tomatensoße?

Overall, Weiße Bohnen in Tomatensoße has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Weiße Bohnen in Tomatensoße has fewer calories: 86 kcal versus 118 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Kikkererwten in curry has less sugar: 1.1 g versus 4.6 g per 100 g.

More comparisons