Comparison

Kielbasa slaska vs Käse-Cabanossi

Overall, Kielbasa slaska has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientKielbasa slaskaKäse-Cabanossi
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 245 kcal 483 kcal
Fat 20 g 41 g
Saturated fat 7.4 g 18 g
Sugars 0.7 g 1.5 g
Salt 1.9 g 3.2 g
Fiber — 0 g
Protein 15 g 27 g
Additives33
AllergensNone listedMilk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Kielbasa slaska has 49% fewer calories (245 kcal vs 483 kcal).
  • Kielbasa slaska has 51% less fat (20 g vs 41 g).
  • Kielbasa slaska has 59% less saturated fat (7.4 g vs 18 g).
  • Kielbasa slaska has 53% less sugar (0.7 g vs 1.5 g).
  • Kielbasa slaska has 41% less salt (1.9 g vs 3.2 g).
  • Käse-Cabanossi has 44% more protein (27 g vs 15 g).
  • Only Käse-Cabanossi lists: Milk.

Ingredients

Kielbasa slaska

90% Pork, Water, Salt, Stabiliser: Diphosphates; Glucose, Spices, Hydrolysed Vegetable Protein (Rapeseed, Maize), Antioxidant: Ascorbic Acid; Spice Extract, Preservative: Sodium Nitrite. Filled into Natural Pork Casings. Allergy Advice: May contain Celery, Milk, Mustard and Cereals containing Gluten.

Käse-Cabanossi

Schweinefleisch, Emmentaler, Nitritpökelsalz (Speisesalz, Konservierungsstoff: Natriumnitrit), Gewürze, Stabilisator: Natriumcitrate; Dextrose, Antioxidationsmittel: Ascorbinsäure; Gewürzextrakte, essbare Wursthülle (Rinderkollagen), Buchenholzrauch. Dieses Produkt ist von Natur aus glutenfrei.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Kielbasa slaska or Käse-Cabanossi?

Overall, Kielbasa slaska has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Kielbasa slaska has fewer calories: 245 kcal versus 483 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Kielbasa slaska has less sugar: 0.7 g versus 1.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons