Kielbasa slaska vs Kabanossi Käse
Overall, Kielbasa slaska has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Kielbasa slaska | Kabanossi Käse |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 245 kcal | 529 kcal |
| Fat | 20 g | 46 g |
| Saturated fat | 7.4 g | 18 g |
| Sugars | 0.7 g | 1.4 g |
| Salt | 1.9 g | 2.1 g |
| Protein | 15 g | 25 g |
| Additives | 3 | 3 |
| Allergens | None listed | Chicken, Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Kielbasa slaska has 54% fewer calories (245 kcal vs 529 kcal).
- Kielbasa slaska has 57% less fat (20 g vs 46 g).
- Kielbasa slaska has 59% less saturated fat (7.4 g vs 18 g).
- Kielbasa slaska has 50% less sugar (0.7 g vs 1.4 g).
- Kabanossi Käse has 40% more protein (25 g vs 15 g).
- Only Kabanossi Käse lists: Chicken, Milk.
Ingredients
Kielbasa slaska
90% Pork, Water, Salt, Stabiliser: Diphosphates; Glucose, Spices, Hydrolysed Vegetable Protein (Rapeseed, Maize), Antioxidant: Ascorbic Acid; Spice Extract, Preservative: Sodium Nitrite. Filled into Natural Pork Casings. Allergy Advice: May contain Celery, Milk, Mustard and Cereals containing Gluten.
Kabanossi Käse
poultry meat (chicken, turkey), pork meat, pork fat, cheese (contains milk), starch, salt, spices, spices extracts, flavourings (contains milk), pork protein, sugar, antioxidant sodium ascorbate, preservative: sodium nitrite. Edible casing - gelling agent sodium alginate, stabilisers: cellulose, calcium chloride
FAQ
Which is healthier: Kielbasa slaska or Kabanossi Käse?
Overall, Kielbasa slaska has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Kielbasa slaska has fewer calories: 245 kcal versus 529 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kielbasa slaska has less sugar: 0.7 g versus 1.4 g per 100 g.