Kiełbasa Krakowska sucha vs Kielbasa slaska
Overall, Kiełbasa Krakowska sucha has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Kiełbasa Krakowska sucha | Kielbasa slaska |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 164 kcal | 245 kcal |
| Fat | 6.9 g | 20 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.8 g | 7.4 g |
| Sugars | 1 g | 0.7 g |
| Salt | 3.1 g | 1.9 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 24 g | 15 g |
| Additives | 0 | 3 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Kiełbasa Krakowska sucha has 33% fewer calories (164 kcal vs 245 kcal).
- Kiełbasa Krakowska sucha has 66% less fat (6.9 g vs 20 g).
- Kiełbasa Krakowska sucha has 76% less saturated fat (1.8 g vs 7.4 g).
- Kielbasa slaska has 30% less sugar (0.7 g vs 1 g).
- Kielbasa slaska has 39% less salt (1.9 g vs 3.1 g).
- Kiełbasa Krakowska sucha has 38% more protein (24 g vs 15 g).
- Kiełbasa Krakowska sucha has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Kiełbasa Krakowska sucha
Mięso wieprzowe z szynki, sól, przyprawy, aerola w proszku, aromaty naturalne
Kielbasa slaska
90% Pork, Water, Salt, Stabiliser: Diphosphates; Glucose, Spices, Hydrolysed Vegetable Protein (Rapeseed, Maize), Antioxidant: Ascorbic Acid; Spice Extract, Preservative: Sodium Nitrite. Filled into Natural Pork Casings. Allergy Advice: May contain Celery, Milk, Mustard and Cereals containing Gluten.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Kiełbasa Krakowska sucha or Kielbasa slaska?
Overall, Kiełbasa Krakowska sucha has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Kiełbasa Krakowska sucha has fewer calories: 164 kcal versus 245 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kielbasa slaska has less sugar: 0.7 g versus 1 g per 100 g.