Comparison

Chilli Kabanossu vs Kielbasa slaska

Overall, Kielbasa slaska has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientChilli KabanossuKielbasa slaska
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 490 kcal 245 kcal
Fat 41 g 20 g
Saturated fat 16 g 7.4 g
Sugars 1.9 g 0.7 g
Salt 7.8 g 1.9 g
Fiber 0.5 g —
Protein 25 g 15 g
Additives53
AllergensPorkNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Kielbasa slaska has 50% fewer calories (245 kcal vs 490 kcal).
  • Kielbasa slaska has 51% less fat (20 g vs 41 g).
  • Kielbasa slaska has 54% less saturated fat (7.4 g vs 16 g).
  • Kielbasa slaska has 63% less sugar (0.7 g vs 1.9 g).
  • Kielbasa slaska has 75% less salt (1.9 g vs 7.8 g).
  • Chilli Kabanossu has 40% more protein (25 g vs 15 g).
  • Only Chilli Kabanossu lists: Pork.

Ingredients

Chilli Kabanossu

Pork, Potato Starch, Salt, Spices (including 1% Chilli), Spice Extracts, Flavourings, Pork Protein, Glucose, Antioxidant: Sodium Ascorbate; Preservative: Sodium Nitrite; Edible Alginate Casing (Gelling Agent: Sodium Alginate; Stabilisers: Cellulose, Calcium Chloride). Filled into Edible Alginate Casings. Made with 185g of pork per 100g of finished product. Allergy Advice May contain Celery, Milk, Mustard, Nuts and Soya

Kielbasa slaska

90% Pork, Water, Salt, Stabiliser: Diphosphates; Glucose, Spices, Hydrolysed Vegetable Protein (Rapeseed, Maize), Antioxidant: Ascorbic Acid; Spice Extract, Preservative: Sodium Nitrite. Filled into Natural Pork Casings. Allergy Advice: May contain Celery, Milk, Mustard and Cereals containing Gluten.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Chilli Kabanossu or Kielbasa slaska?

Overall, Kielbasa slaska has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Kielbasa slaska has fewer calories: 245 kcal versus 490 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Kielbasa slaska has less sugar: 0.7 g versus 1.9 g per 100 g.

More comparisons