Comparison
Kichererbsen vs Chickpeas in water
Overall, Kichererbsen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Kichererbsen | Chickpeas in water |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | b |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 127 kcal | 128 kcal |
| Fat | 2.2 g | 2.9 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.3 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0.6 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 5.4 g | — |
| Protein | 7.3 g | 7.2 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Kichererbsen has 24% less fat (2.2 g vs 2.9 g).
- Chickpeas in water has no saturated fat, while Kichererbsen has 0.3 g.
- Kichererbsen has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Kichererbsen
Kichererbsen (enthält Sulfite), Wasser.
Chickpeas in water
Organic chickpeas (60%), water*, ascorbic acid* *Non-organic Ingredients
FAQ
Which is healthier: Kichererbsen or Chickpeas in water?
Overall, Kichererbsen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Kichererbsen has fewer calories: 127 kcal versus 128 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Chickpeas in water has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.6 g per 100 g.