Ketjap manis vs Satésaus
Overall, Satésaus has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Ketjap manis | Satésaus |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 207 kcal | 214 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 10.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 1.4 g |
| Sugars | 44.4 g | 18 g |
| Salt | 3.4 g | 1.5 g |
| Fiber | — | 1.8 g |
| Protein | 6.6 g | 4.9 g |
| Additives | 2 | 4 |
| Allergens | Gluten, Soybeans | Peanuts, Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Ketjap manis has no fat, while Satésaus has 10.3 g.
- Ketjap manis has no saturated fat, while Satésaus has 1.4 g.
- Satésaus has 59% less sugar (18 g vs 44.4 g).
- Satésaus has 56% less salt (1.5 g vs 3.4 g).
- Ketjap manis has 26% more protein (6.6 g vs 4.9 g).
- Satésaus has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Ketjap manis lists: Gluten.
- Only Satésaus lists: Peanuts.
Ingredients
Ketjap manis
Melasse, water, zout, sojabonen, caramel, suiker, voedingszuur E270, tarwemeel, conserveermiddel E211, natuurlijk aroma
Satésaus
Water, PINDA's 20%, dextrose, suiker, gemodificeerd maïszetmeel, zout, specerijen (knoflookpoeder, gember, uienpoeder), azijs sambal (rode chilipeper, zout, voedingszuur, ?), conserveermiddel: E210), raapzaadolie, voedingszuur: melkzuur, gebrande suiker, conserveermiddel: E202, maltodextrine, emulgator: SOJAlecithine, antioxidant: extracten van rozemarijn,
FAQ
Which is healthier: Ketjap manis or Satésaus?
Overall, Satésaus has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Ketjap manis has fewer calories: 207 kcal versus 214 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Satésaus has less sugar: 18 g versus 44.4 g per 100 g.