Ketjap manis vs Satésaus
Overall, Satésaus has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Ketjap manis | Satésaus |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 207 kcal | 228 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 13 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 1.9 g |
| Sugars | 44.4 g | 13 g |
| Salt | 3.4 g | 0.9 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 6.6 g | 7.9 g |
| Additives | 2 | 4 |
| Allergens | Gluten, Soybeans | Lupin, Peanuts, Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Ketjap manis has no fat, while Satésaus has 13 g.
- Ketjap manis has no saturated fat, while Satésaus has 1.9 g.
- Satésaus has 71% less sugar (13 g vs 44.4 g).
- Satésaus has 74% less salt (0.9 g vs 3.4 g).
- Satésaus has 16% more protein (7.9 g vs 6.6 g).
- Satésaus has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Ketjap manis lists: Gluten.
- Only Satésaus lists: Lupin, Peanuts.
Ingredients
Ketjap manis
Melasse, water, zout, sojabonen, caramel, suiker, voedingszuur E270, tarwemeel, conserveermiddel E211, natuurlijk aroma
Satésaus
Water, gemalen pinda's 26%, suiker, natuurazijn, sojasaus (water, sojabonen, zout, natuurazijn), gemodificeerd zetmeel (mais en aardappel), sambal (chili pepers, zout), knoflook, specerijen, raapolie, aroma, lupinemeel, kleurstoffen: E150cen paprika-extract, voedingszuur: melkzuur, verdikkingsmiddel: guarpitmeel, conserveermiddel: kaliumsorbaat. Gemiddelde per per
FAQ
Which is healthier: Ketjap manis or Satésaus?
Overall, Satésaus has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Ketjap manis has fewer calories: 207 kcal versus 228 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Satésaus has less sugar: 13 g versus 44.4 g per 100 g.