Satésaus vs Sambel Pecel Sedang
Overall, Satésaus has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Satésaus | Sambel Pecel Sedang |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 228 kcal | 460 kcal |
| Fat | 13 g | 28 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.9 g | 6 g |
| Sugars | 13 g | 28 g |
| Salt | 0.9 g | 2.9 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 6 g |
| Protein | 7.9 g | 18 g |
| Additives | 4 | 0 |
| Allergens | Lupin, Peanuts, Soybeans | Peanuts |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Satésaus has 50% fewer calories (228 kcal vs 460 kcal).
- Satésaus has 54% less fat (13 g vs 28 g).
- Satésaus has 68% less saturated fat (1.9 g vs 6 g).
- Satésaus has 54% less sugar (13 g vs 28 g).
- Satésaus has 69% less salt (0.9 g vs 2.9 g).
- Sambel Pecel Sedang has 100% more fiber (6 g vs 0 g).
- Sambel Pecel Sedang has 56% more protein (18 g vs 7.9 g).
- Satésaus has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Satésaus lists: Lupin, Soybeans.
Ingredients
Satésaus
Water, gemalen pinda's 26%, suiker, natuurazijn, sojasaus (water, sojabonen, zout, natuurazijn), gemodificeerd zetmeel (mais en aardappel), sambal (chili pepers, zout), knoflook, specerijen, raapolie, aroma, lupinemeel, kleurstoffen: E150cen paprika-extract, voedingszuur: melkzuur, verdikkingsmiddel: guarpitmeel, conserveermiddel: kaliumsorbaat. Gemiddelde per per
Sambel Pecel Sedang
Ingrediente: Peanut, Palm Sugar, Chili, Salt Garlic, Galingale, Citrus Leaves, amand.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Satésaus or Sambel Pecel Sedang?
Overall, Satésaus has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Satésaus has fewer calories: 228 kcal versus 460 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Satésaus has less sugar: 13 g versus 28 g per 100 g.