Satésaus vs Sambel Pecel Sedang
Overall, Satésaus has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Satésaus | Sambel Pecel Sedang |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 214 kcal | 460 kcal |
| Fat | 10.3 g | 28 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.4 g | 6 g |
| Sugars | 18 g | 28 g |
| Salt | 1.5 g | 2.9 g |
| Fiber | 1.8 g | 6 g |
| Protein | 4.9 g | 18 g |
| Additives | 4 | 0 |
| Allergens | Peanuts, Soybeans | Peanuts |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Satésaus has 53% fewer calories (214 kcal vs 460 kcal).
- Satésaus has 63% less fat (10.3 g vs 28 g).
- Satésaus has 77% less saturated fat (1.4 g vs 6 g).
- Satésaus has 36% less sugar (18 g vs 28 g).
- Satésaus has 49% less salt (1.5 g vs 2.9 g).
- Sambel Pecel Sedang has 70% more fiber (6 g vs 1.8 g).
- Sambel Pecel Sedang has 73% more protein (18 g vs 4.9 g).
- Satésaus has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Satésaus lists: Soybeans.
Ingredients
Satésaus
Water, PINDA's 20%, dextrose, suiker, gemodificeerd maïszetmeel, zout, specerijen (knoflookpoeder, gember, uienpoeder), azijs sambal (rode chilipeper, zout, voedingszuur, ?), conserveermiddel: E210), raapzaadolie, voedingszuur: melkzuur, gebrande suiker, conserveermiddel: E202, maltodextrine, emulgator: SOJAlecithine, antioxidant: extracten van rozemarijn,
Sambel Pecel Sedang
Ingrediente: Peanut, Palm Sugar, Chili, Salt Garlic, Galingale, Citrus Leaves, amand.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Satésaus or Sambel Pecel Sedang?
Overall, Satésaus has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Satésaus has fewer calories: 214 kcal versus 460 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Satésaus has less sugar: 18 g versus 28 g per 100 g.