Jausen Stangere vs Sardellen-Filets
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Jausen Stangere | Sardellen-Filets |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 507 kcal | 210 kcal |
| Fat | 42 g | 12 g |
| Saturated fat | 18 g | 1.6 g |
| Sugars | 0.1 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 4.5 g | 15 g |
| Fiber | — | 0.5 g |
| Protein | 32 g | 24 g |
| Additives | 4 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Sardellen-Filets has 59% fewer calories (210 kcal vs 507 kcal).
- Sardellen-Filets has 71% less fat (12 g vs 42 g).
- Sardellen-Filets has 91% less saturated fat (1.6 g vs 18 g).
- Jausen Stangere has 80% less sugar (0.1 g vs 0.5 g).
- Jausen Stangere has 70% less salt (4.5 g vs 15 g).
- Jausen Stangere has 25% more protein (32 g vs 24 g).
Ingredients
Jausen Stangere
Schweinefleisch, Speisesalz, Gewürze, Dextrose, Stabilisator: Polyphosphate; Gewürzextrakte, Kräu - E ter, Antioxidationsmittel: Natriumascorbat; Konservierungsstoff: Natriumnitrit; essbare Wursthülle (Überzugsmittel: Natriumalginat; Festigungsmittel: d Calciumchlorid), Reifekulturen, Buchenholzrauch. 100 g Jausen-Stangerl werden hergestellt aus 190 g Schweinefleisch. Kann Spuren von Senf und Sellerie enthalten. *Referenzmenge für einen durchschnittlichen Erwachsenen (8400 kJ/2000 kcal) K da E Jausen-Stangerl Klassik, 90 g: 10 Stück à ca. 9g S
Sardellen-Filets
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Jausen Stangere or Sardellen-Filets?
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Sardellen-Filets has fewer calories: 210 kcal versus 507 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Jausen Stangere has less sugar: 0.1 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.