Iglo Chicken sticks bel vs KaasTengels Chili Kaas
Overall, Iglo Chicken sticks bel has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Iglo Chicken sticks bel | KaasTengels Chili Kaas |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | e |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 258 kcal | 293 kcal |
| Fat | 11 g | 15 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.5 g | 6.4 g |
| Sugars | 0.6 g | 0.6 g |
| Salt | 2.5 g | 2.4 g |
| Fiber | 1.7 g | — |
| Protein | 14 g | 11 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Iglo Chicken sticks bel has 12% fewer calories (258 kcal vs 293 kcal).
- Iglo Chicken sticks bel has 27% less fat (11 g vs 15 g).
- Iglo Chicken sticks bel has 77% less saturated fat (1.5 g vs 6.4 g).
- Iglo Chicken sticks bel has 21% more protein (14 g vs 11 g).
- Iglo Chicken sticks bel has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Iglo Chicken sticks bel
iglo Snack & Share new SMAAKVE kleurstoffen GERS ni colorants at arimes artificiels EXHAUST AUSANS CO EURS 10 Chicken Sticks DE GOUT Oven, pan & airfryer 250ge Geschahe antal/Nombre approximatif NUTRI-SCORE ABCDE versuggestie Suggestion de présentation Serviervorschillag
KaasTengels Chili Kaas
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Iglo Chicken sticks bel or KaasTengels Chili Kaas?
Overall, Iglo Chicken sticks bel has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Iglo Chicken sticks bel has fewer calories: 258 kcal versus 293 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Iglo Chicken sticks bel has less sugar: 0.6 g versus 0.6 g per 100 g.