Iglo Chicken sticks bel vs Crispy Chick'n Original
Overall, Crispy Chick'n Original has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Iglo Chicken sticks bel | Crispy Chick'n Original |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | c |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 258 kcal | 248 kcal |
| Fat | 11 g | 11 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.5 g | 1.2 g |
| Sugars | 0.6 g | 0.3 g |
| Salt | 2.5 g | 1.4 g |
| Fiber | 1.7 g | 0.6 g |
| Protein | 14 g | 15 g |
| Additives | 0 | 4 |
| Allergens | None listed | Gluten, Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Crispy Chick'n Original has 20% less saturated fat (1.2 g vs 1.5 g).
- Crispy Chick'n Original has 50% less sugar (0.3 g vs 0.6 g).
- Crispy Chick'n Original has 45% less salt (1.4 g vs 2.5 g).
- Iglo Chicken sticks bel has 65% more fiber (1.7 g vs 0.6 g).
- Crispy Chick'n Original has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Crispy Chick'n Original lists: Gluten, Soybeans.
Ingredients
Iglo Chicken sticks bel
iglo Snack & Share new SMAAKVE kleurstoffen GERS ni colorants at arimes artificiels EXHAUST AUSANS CO EURS 10 Chicken Sticks DE GOUT Oven, pan & airfryer 250ge Geschahe antal/Nombre approximatif NUTRI-SCORE ABCDE versuggestie Suggestion de présentation Serviervorschillag
Crispy Chick'n Original
Kipfilet 49% (kipfilet 100%), paneermeelmix (tarwebloem, tarwegluten, gist, zout, specerij, raapolie), water, doorhaalmiddel (tarwebloem, tarwezetmeel, zout, rijsmiddelen: E450, E500), plantaardige oliën (raap, palm), kippencollageen, kruidenmix (specerijen, bouillonpoeder (zout, plantaardig eiwithydrolysaat, zetmeel, suiker, gistextract, maltodextrine, zonnebloemolie, kruiden, specerijen, natuurlijk aroma), dextrose, kruiden), natuurlijk aroma, soja-eiwitconcentraat, zout, emulgatoren: E450, E451, E452, groentepoeder (knoflook, ui), suiker, specerij
FAQ
Which is healthier: Iglo Chicken sticks bel or Crispy Chick'n Original?
Overall, Crispy Chick'n Original has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Crispy Chick'n Original has fewer calories: 248 kcal versus 258 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Crispy Chick'n Original has less sugar: 0.3 g versus 0.6 g per 100 g.