Iebiezināts piens bez cukura vs Mleko zagęszczone UHT 7,5%
Overall, Iebiezināts piens bez cukura has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Iebiezināts piens bez cukura
Mleko zagęszczone UHT 7,5%
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Iebiezināts piens bez cukura | Mleko zagęszczone UHT 7,5% |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | 1 | 4 |
| Calories | 136 kcal | 134 kcal |
| Fat | 7.8 g | 7.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 4.7 g | 4.8 g |
| Sugars | 9.7 g | 11 g |
| Salt | 0.3 g | 0.2 g |
| Protein | 6.7 g | 5.5 g |
| Additives | 1 | 1 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Iebiezināts piens bez cukura has 12% less sugar (9.7 g vs 11 g).
- Iebiezināts piens bez cukura has 18% more protein (6.7 g vs 5.5 g).
- Iebiezināts piens bez cukura is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Iebiezināts piens bez cukura
_piens_, stabilizētāji E332, E339
Mleko zagęszczone UHT 7,5%
_mleko_, stabilizator - karagen.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Iebiezināts piens bez cukura or Mleko zagęszczone UHT 7,5%?
Overall, Iebiezināts piens bez cukura has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Mleko zagęszczone UHT 7,5% has fewer calories: 134 kcal versus 136 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Iebiezināts piens bez cukura has less sugar: 9.7 g versus 11 g per 100 g.