Iebiezināts piens bez cukura vs Purisima
Overall, Iebiezināts piens bez cukura has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Iebiezināts piens bez cukura | Purisima |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 136 kcal | 142 kcal |
| Fat | 7.8 g | 8.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 4.7 g | 5.8 g |
| Sugars | 9.7 g | 9.6 g |
| Salt | 0.3 g | 0.2 g |
| Protein | 6.7 g | 6.6 g |
| Additives | 1 | 1 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Iebiezināts piens bez cukura has 19% less saturated fat (4.7 g vs 5.8 g).
Ingredients
Iebiezināts piens bez cukura
_piens_, stabilizētāji E332, E339
Purisima
Lait entier, stabilisateur (E339), vitamine D3. Matière grasse 8% minimum. Matière sèche dégraissé du lait 17%
FAQ
Which is healthier: Iebiezināts piens bez cukura or Purisima?
Overall, Iebiezināts piens bez cukura has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Iebiezināts piens bez cukura has fewer calories: 136 kcal versus 142 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Purisima has less sugar: 9.6 g versus 9.7 g per 100 g.