Comparison

Honung & salt nöt mix mandel & jordnötter vs OLW Nöt Mix Honung & Mild Chili

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientHonung & salt nöt mix mandel...OLW Nöt Mix Honung & Mild Ch...
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 534 kcal 590 kcal
Fat 34.2 g 45 g
Saturated fat 4.1 g 7.7 g
Sugars 33.6 g 12 g
Salt 1.1 g 1.2 g
Fiber 6.7 g —
Protein 16.9 g 23 g
Additives12
AllergensNuts, PeanutsNuts, Peanuts

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Honung & salt nöt mix mandel & jordnötter has 24% less fat (34.2 g vs 45 g).
  • Honung & salt nöt mix mandel & jordnötter has 47% less saturated fat (4.1 g vs 7.7 g).
  • OLW Nöt Mix Honung & Mild Chili has 64% less sugar (12 g vs 33.6 g).
  • OLW Nöt Mix Honung & Mild Chili has 27% more protein (23 g vs 16.9 g).

Ingredients

Honung & salt nöt mix mandel & jordnötter

MANDEL (32%), JORDNÖTTER (32%), socker, honung (2,4%), geleringsmedel (gummi arabicum), solrosolja, sheafett, salt.

OLW Nöt Mix Honung & Mild Chili

jordnötter 35% (jordnötter 95%, solrosolja, salt) chili-honungs-jordnötter 35% (jordnötter 76%, socker, honung 4%, chili 2%, havssalt 1%) honungsrostade jordnötter 15% (jordnötter 75%, socker, honung 5%, solrosolja, salt, majsstärkelse, stabiliseringsmedel (metylcellulosa, xantangummi), arom), cashewnötter 15% (cashewnötter 96%, solrosolja, havssalt 1%).

FAQ

Which is healthier: Honung & salt nöt mix mandel & jordnötter or OLW Nöt Mix Honung & Mild Chili?

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Honung & salt nöt mix mandel & jordnötter has fewer calories: 534 kcal versus 590 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

OLW Nöt Mix Honung & Mild Chili has less sugar: 12 g versus 33.6 g per 100 g.

More comparisons