Comparison

Herzhafter Kartoffelsalat mit Bauchspeck vs Pasta Snack Rahm Sauce

Overall, Pasta Snack Rahm Sauce has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientHerzhafter Kartoffelsalat mi...Pasta Snack Rahm Sauce
Nutri-Score c a
NOVA group 4 —
Calories 170 kcal 105 kcal
Fat 10.5 g 2.8 g
Saturated fat 1 g 1.1 g
Sugars 4.7 g 2.5 g
Salt 0.9 g 0.7 g
Fiber — 0.7 g
Protein 1.9 g 3.3 g
Additives30
AllergensEggsNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Pasta Snack Rahm Sauce has 38% fewer calories (105 kcal vs 170 kcal).
  • Pasta Snack Rahm Sauce has 73% less fat (2.8 g vs 10.5 g).
  • Pasta Snack Rahm Sauce has 47% less sugar (2.5 g vs 4.7 g).
  • Pasta Snack Rahm Sauce has 42% more protein (3.3 g vs 1.9 g).
  • Pasta Snack Rahm Sauce has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Herzhafter Kartoffelsalat mit Bauchspeck lists: Eggs.

Ingredients

Herzhafter Kartoffelsalat mit Bauchspeck

62% Kartoffelm, Wasser, Rapsöl, Zucker, 3% Bauchspeck gegart, geräuchert (Schweinebauch, Speisesalz, Buchenholzrauch), 3% Zwiebeln, Branntweinessig, Maisstärke, Hühnereigelb, Speisesalz, Senfsaatem, Verdickungsmittel: Guarkernmehl, Xanthan; Säureregulator: Natriumacetate: Dextrose, Gewürze, natürliches Aroma. *von Eiern aus Bodenhaltung. Dieses Produkt ist gluten-und laktosefrei. Ungeöffnet bei +2°C bis +7°C

Pasta Snack Rahm Sauce

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Herzhafter Kartoffelsalat mit Bauchspeck or Pasta Snack Rahm Sauce?

Overall, Pasta Snack Rahm Sauce has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Pasta Snack Rahm Sauce has fewer calories: 105 kcal versus 170 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Pasta Snack Rahm Sauce has less sugar: 2.5 g versus 4.7 g per 100 g.

More comparisons