Comparison

Heinz Salad Cream 30% less fat imp vs Aromat

Overall, Aromat has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 3.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientHeinz Salad Cream 30% less f...Aromat
Nutri-Score d e
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 207 kcal 165 kcal
Fat 16 g 3.5 g
Saturated fat 1.4 g 1.2 g
Sugars 10.4 g 7.1 g
Salt 1.5 g 57.9 g
Fiber 0.2 g 0.6 g
Protein 1.1 g 13 g
Additives31
AllergensEggs, MustardCelery, Gluten, Milk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Aromat has 20% fewer calories (165 kcal vs 207 kcal).
  • Aromat has 78% less fat (3.5 g vs 16 g).
  • Aromat has 32% less sugar (7.1 g vs 10.4 g).
  • Heinz Salad Cream 30% less fat imp has 97% less salt (1.5 g vs 57.9 g).
  • Aromat has 75% more fiber (0.6 g vs 0.2 g).
  • Aromat has 92% more protein (13 g vs 1.1 g).
  • Heinz Salad Cream 30% less fat imp has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Heinz Salad Cream 30% less fat imp lists: Eggs, Mustard.
  • Only Aromat lists: Celery, Gluten, Milk.

Ingredients

Heinz Salad Cream 30% less fat imp

water, spirit vinegar, rapeseed oil (14%), sugar, cornflour, pasteurised egg yolks (4%), mustard, salt, sweetener - acesulfame k, colour - riboflavin.

Aromat

Sel de cuisine iodé, Exhausteurs de goût (Glutamate monosodique), Sucre de lait, Amidon de blé, Extrait de levure, Épices (Oignons, Ail, curcuma, Graine de céleri, Clous de girofle, Laurier), Huiles végétales (Palme, Tournesols), Extraits de champignons

FAQ

Which is healthier: Heinz Salad Cream 30% less fat imp or Aromat?

Overall, Aromat has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Aromat has fewer calories: 165 kcal versus 207 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Aromat has less sugar: 7.1 g versus 10.4 g per 100 g.

More comparisons