Havervlokken Fibre Fit vs ISOSTAR powertabs lemon
Overall, Havervlokken Fibre Fit has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Havervlokken Fibre Fit | ISOSTAR powertabs lemon |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | e |
| NOVA group | 1 | 4 |
| Calories | 367 kcal | 358 kcal |
| Fat | 6.7 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.3 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 6 g | 75 g |
| Salt | 1 g | 3.5 g |
| Fiber | 10.9 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 11.8 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- ISOSTAR powertabs lemon has no fat, while Havervlokken Fibre Fit has 6.7 g.
- ISOSTAR powertabs lemon has no saturated fat, while Havervlokken Fibre Fit has 1.3 g.
- Havervlokken Fibre Fit has 92% less sugar (6 g vs 75 g).
- Havervlokken Fibre Fit has 71% less salt (1 g vs 3.5 g).
- Havervlokken Fibre Fit has 100% more fiber (10.9 g vs 0 g).
- Havervlokken Fibre Fit has 100% more protein (11.8 g vs 0 g).
- Havervlokken Fibre Fit has the better Nutri-Score.
- Havervlokken Fibre Fit is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Havervlokken Fibre Fit
Flocons d'avoine
ISOSTAR powertabs lemon
Dextrose, acidifiant: acide citrique, bicarbonate de sodium, amidon, maltodextrine, arôme naturel de citron avec autres arômes naturels (colorant : caroténoïdes), bicarbonate de potassium, carbonate de magnésium, carbonate de calcium, chlorure de sodium, sels de calcium de l'acide orthophosphorique, édulcorant : aspartame, vitamines C, E, B1.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Havervlokken Fibre Fit or ISOSTAR powertabs lemon?
Overall, Havervlokken Fibre Fit has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
ISOSTAR powertabs lemon has fewer calories: 358 kcal versus 367 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Havervlokken Fibre Fit has less sugar: 6 g versus 75 g per 100 g.