Hasselnusskerne vs Avellana Natural
Overall, Hasselnusskerne has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Hasselnusskerne | Avellana Natural |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | — | 1 |
| Calories | 668 kcal | 671 kcal |
| Fat | 64 g | 63.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 5.8 g | 6.2 g |
| Sugars | 2.5 g | 3.7 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | 12 g | 9.8 g |
| Protein | 15 g | 15.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Nuts |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Hasselnusskerne has 32% less sugar (2.5 g vs 3.7 g).
- Hasselnusskerne has 18% more fiber (12 g vs 9.8 g).
- Only Avellana Natural lists: Nuts.
Ingredients
Hasselnusskerne
Not available.
Avellana Natural
Avellana
FAQ
Which is healthier: Hasselnusskerne or Avellana Natural?
Overall, Hasselnusskerne has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Hasselnusskerne has fewer calories: 668 kcal versus 671 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Hasselnusskerne has less sugar: 2.5 g versus 3.7 g per 100 g.