Bio-Haselnusskerne vs Avellana Natural
Overall, Avellana Natural has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Bio-Haselnusskerne | Avellana Natural |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 661 kcal | 671 kcal |
| Fat | 62 g | 63.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 4.5 g | 6.2 g |
| Sugars | 7.4 g | 3.7 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | 8.2 g | 9.8 g |
| Protein | 12 g | 15.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Nuts | Nuts |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Bio-Haselnusskerne has 27% less saturated fat (4.5 g vs 6.2 g).
- Avellana Natural has 50% less sugar (3.7 g vs 7.4 g).
- Avellana Natural has 16% more fiber (9.8 g vs 8.2 g).
- Avellana Natural has 23% more protein (15.5 g vs 12 g).
Ingredients
Bio-Haselnusskerne
Haselnusskerne
Avellana Natural
Avellana
FAQ
Which is healthier: Bio-Haselnusskerne or Avellana Natural?
Overall, Avellana Natural has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Bio-Haselnusskerne has fewer calories: 661 kcal versus 671 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Avellana Natural has less sugar: 3.7 g versus 7.4 g per 100 g.