Comparison
Haselnusskerne vs Nocciole bio
Overall, Nocciole bio has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Haselnusskerne | Nocciole bio |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 722 kcal | 834 kcal |
| Fat | 70.5 g | 55 g |
| Saturated fat | 6.8 g | 4.9 g |
| Sugars | 3.5 g | 4 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 8.2 g | 8 g |
| Protein | 14.3 g | 16 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Nuts | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Haselnusskerne has 13% fewer calories (722 kcal vs 834 kcal).
- Nocciole bio has 22% less fat (55 g vs 70.5 g).
- Nocciole bio has 28% less saturated fat (4.9 g vs 6.8 g).
- Haselnusskerne has 13% less sugar (3.5 g vs 4 g).
- Nocciole bio has 11% more protein (16 g vs 14.3 g).
- Only Haselnusskerne lists: Nuts.
Ingredients
Haselnusskerne
Haselnusskerne, ganz, geröstet, blanchiert
Nocciole bio
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Haselnusskerne or Nocciole bio?
Overall, Nocciole bio has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Haselnusskerne has fewer calories: 722 kcal versus 834 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Haselnusskerne has less sugar: 3.5 g versus 4 g per 100 g.