Comparison
Haselnusskerne vs Haselnusskerne
Overall, Haselnusskerne has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Haselnusskerne | Haselnusskerne |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 663 kcal | 722 kcal |
| Fat | 61 g | 70.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 4.8 g | 6.8 g |
| Sugars | 5 g | 3.5 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 7.7 g | 8.2 g |
| Protein | 17 g | 14.3 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Nuts |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Haselnusskerne has 13% less fat (61 g vs 70.5 g).
- Haselnusskerne has 29% less saturated fat (4.8 g vs 6.8 g).
- Haselnusskerne has 30% less sugar (3.5 g vs 5 g).
- Haselnusskerne has 16% more protein (17 g vs 14.3 g).
- Only Haselnusskerne lists: Nuts.
Ingredients
Haselnusskerne
Not available.
Haselnusskerne
Haselnusskerne, ganz, geröstet, blanchiert
FAQ
Which is healthier: Haselnusskerne or Haselnusskerne?
Overall, Haselnusskerne has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Haselnusskerne has fewer calories: 663 kcal versus 722 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Haselnusskerne has less sugar: 3.5 g versus 5 g per 100 g.