Haricots blancs tomate vs Alubia Blanca
Overall, Alubia Blanca has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Haricots blancs tomate | Alubia Blanca |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | b |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 75 kcal | 83 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 1.2 g | 0.8 g |
| Salt | 0.9 g | 0.8 g |
| Fiber | 5.1 g | — |
| Protein | 4.9 g | 5.8 g |
| Additives | 1 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | Sulphur dioxide and sulphites |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Alubia Blanca has 33% less sugar (0.8 g vs 1.2 g).
- Alubia Blanca has 16% more protein (5.8 g vs 4.9 g).
- Alubia Blanca is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Alubia Blanca lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.
Ingredients
Haricots blancs tomate
Eau, haricots blancs trempés 45 %, purée de tomates double concentree 3,6%, sel, amidon modifié de maïs. oignon grillé en poudre, arôme naturel. Traces de soja.
Alubia Blanca
white beans, water, salt, antioxidants (e-385)
FAQ
Which is healthier: Haricots blancs tomate or Alubia Blanca?
Overall, Alubia Blanca has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Haricots blancs tomate has fewer calories: 75 kcal versus 83 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Alubia Blanca has less sugar: 0.8 g versus 1.2 g per 100 g.